Cloud capacity baseline
2–3 weeks
Model the workload, current estate and commercial options before making a longer commitment.
Estma service / Cloud capacity
Turn forecast compute, GPU, storage and managed-service demand into an annual cloud capacity plan, then provision, monitor and optimise the environment around it.
Where this starts
The operating problem
The engagement focuses on the surrounding system: boundaries, evidence, permissions, exceptions, people and the decisions the implementation must support.
A commercial commitment is made before the workload and architecture are understood
Compute, storage, networking and managed-service costs have different growth drivers
Resources are provisioned without budgets, alerts, ownership or environment boundaries
Capacity planning ignores deployment, reliability, security and recovery requirements
What leaves the engagement
Ways to start
2–3 weeks
Model the workload, current estate and commercial options before making a longer commitment.
3–6 weeks
Establish the agreed resources, environments, access, monitoring, budgets and operating documentation.
12 months
Combine agreed cloud capacity with usage review, allocation, optimisation and operating support through the term.
Inside the work
Representative engagements show how this capability connects to the product, workflow, controls, and people around it.
Service questions
Depending on the agreed provider and scope, it can include general or GPU compute, object and block storage, managed databases and vector search, containers, serverless services, networking, CDN and cloud AI services.
No. The provider and commercial structure should follow the workload, existing estate, regional availability and support requirements. Any final offer states the specific provider, resources, term and exclusions.
Start with context
Describe the current system, the decision ahead and the constraint that is making progress difficult.